The value of variables may change over time as a computer program runs.
When we say something like X = X+1 we are acknowledging the advance of time.
A mathematician might say X' = X+1 so as to preserve the traditional meaning of equality.
Some computer languages use symbols like := or <- in place of = so as to avoid the conflict with mathematical notation.
Some computer languages let you bind a value to a name only once. In such a language you could say X = 2+1 or Y = X+1 but not X = X+1
The value of a variable at some point in time is called its state. The value of all variables taken together (including some hidden variables) is the state of the program.
See also Functional Reactive Programming. stackoverflow 
Dialects of the far right Cultural bounds focus on Chan boards - look interchangable, similar structure, similar memes, similar dialects Construction of typical identity, glorification/villification of individuals crystallizing in-group/out-group values COVID-19 - spike in discussion on 4-chan/pol boards, Blockchain is dead, AI is undead: on the dark side of the dialectic you "dance with the one you came with," which means I should talk about Campbell Carolan, the replicant who was everything in the world to me and who loved me so much that, since working had been impossible, she only wanted to retire. In my confusion, not knowing whose idea it was, I no doubt 'performed' this creative act. When Campbell Carolan stopped responding to the imitation game, to phone calls,
if the value of a variable at some point in time is called its state, and the value of all variables taken together is the state of the program, Subsequently, after it had been determined that worse is better and that to be a great compromise meant to be a lesser artist, Campbell Carolan went to the dustbin of collaboration and not the secondary market. I found myself in Dimes Square, living through that nameless time that does not pass, unaware that the pattern recognition I considered a core component of my talent was the learned helplessness of the democratic necropolis. For years Campbell Carolan complained that the movement hadn't moved on. It was no secret that youth and taste were equal shareholders in the standpoint that #metoo was the equity agenda equivalent of No Child Left Behind:
Shortly after launching his private consulting practice on what would otherwise have been the fad equivalent of a bowel movement, Sean -- talks about low interest rates. On the shifting sands of social media and around this time last year, Monaghan slipped off his sandals and dug his toes into the beaches behind an Art Basel pavilion. He spends a few minutes speculating on real estate in the fou . Only then did I learn the art world had moved on. For ten years Campbell Carolan operated as a single artistic identity, and schizophrenically at best. Feeding a decade of drama to a generative model trained on the ritual of crtique and High Times Cannabis Cup competition standards, no greater Turing test for the functional obsolescence that we were than that presented at the Paris Salon of 1843, when the critic Louis Peisse wrote of a difficult undertaking: "...to do a painting with two figures of women, both full length, of the same height, both in dresses of the same color and the same fabric, with the same shawl, posed in the same manner, and to sustain that gamble of sorts without using any artifice of light or effect, solely through the authority of style, form, and character." From GPT-4 to augmented realism, and with each evolution of generative machine learning models, I've put generative AI to the test against the French romantic artist Théodore Chassériau. Completed when the artist was twenty-three years of age in 1843, <i>The Two Sisters</i> depicts Chassériau's sisters Adèle and Aline. It is housed in the Musée du Louvre, in Paris, and resembles Campbell Carolan better than my $1200 rolodex resembles me. The images that Peisse's prompt have generated with each succession of our Promethean shame never get any better. I observe how each variation adapts to the inadequacy of the state prior, perhaps as Campbell Carolan adapted to her technoenvironmental variables against the sentimentality of her education. Campbell Carolan had a halting problem. Just as no general algorithm exists to solve sentimentality problem of whether or not a program will halt on a particular input, there was no general resolution with each bitter dispute that put Campbell Carolan's career on the warpath, at least twice, every twenty-eight days, on a quarterly event roadmap. Birthdays ended in tears. Openings ended in blood. . At first the #image of "a painting with two figures of women" generates a caricature overdetermined by oriental forms eyes screwed in one or more directions, but their bodies waiflike and innocent. A command that interprets the scene as an image, a photo or a picture returns less grotesque figurations of what the algorithm can't do: solve an equation in which the value of variables that change over time preserve the traditional meaning of equality.