DOT strict digraph rankdir=TB node [shape=box style="solid,rounded,filled" fillcolor=lightpink penwidth=3 color=white] HERE NODE node [style=filled fillcolor=lightyellow penwidth=3 color=black fontname="Helvetica" fontcolor=white] edge [style=solid penwidth=1 color=white] LINKS HERE -> NODE node [style="filled,rounded" fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=white] HERE NODE LINKS HERE -> NODE BACKLINKS NODE -> HERE node [style="dotted,rounded,filled" penwidth=1 fillcolor=white color=grey] edge [style=dotted penwidth=1 color=red] HERE BACKLINKS NODE -> HERE STATIC strict digraph {rankdir=TB node [shape=box style="solid,rounded,filled" fillcolor=white penwidth=3 color=white] "Preview Next Diagram" node [style="solid,rounded,filled" fillcolor=white penwidth=2 color=white] edge [style=solid penwidth=1 color=black] "Preview Next Diagram" -> "First Link" "Preview Next Diagram" -> "Agile" "Preview Next Diagram" -> "Next Page" node [style="filled,rounded" fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=white] node [style="filled,rounded" fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=white] "Agile" "Agile" -> "Agile Experience" "Agile" -> "Agile Mindset" "Agile" -> "Agile Practices" "Agile" -> "Agile Paradigm" "Agile" -> "Agile Story" node [style="filled,rounded" fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=white] "Composite Survey" -> "Preview Next Diagram" "Item Type Survey" -> "Preview Next Diagram" "Graphs of CHECKS" -> "Preview Next Diagram" "Try Backlinks Diagram" -> "Preview Next Diagram" node [style="dotted,rounded,filled" penwidth=1 fillcolor=white color=grey] edge [style=dotted penwidth=1 color=grey] "Item Type Survey" -> "Composite Survey" node [style="dotted,rounded,filled" penwidth=1 fillcolor=white color=white] edge [style=dotted penwidth=1 color=grey] "Composite Survey" -> "Item Type Survey" "Item Type Survey" -> "Item Type Survey" node [style="dotted,rounded,filled" penwidth=1 fillcolor=white color=white] edge [style=dotted penwidth=1 color=grey] node [style="dotted,rounded,filled" penwidth=1 fillcolor=white color=white] edge [style=dotted penwidth=1 color=grey] "Try Backlinks Diagram" -> "Try Backlinks Diagram"}
Niklas Luhmann: My starting point is always: a Deficit in the current intellectual landscape, which always leads to the fact that individual points of view [⇒ Viewpoint] are pulled up, and are then sold for the Whole [⇒ God’s Eye View ⇒ Varieties].
It doesn't mean that you cover up or don't discover grievances. When you see how people live in favelas, there is already reason to think. And a social theory that is not able to understand the relationship between globalization on the level of functional large-scale systems on the one hand and the grievances of a regional nature on the other hand … If this cannot occur as a topic, something is wrong.
~
„Es gibt keine Biographie“, p. 38–39.
p. 17 Every assertion of criteria, every assertion of starting points, premises, etc., or of theory structures always creates people who disagree.
What do we do with the excluded who don't agree, and in science they should write a better theory, but from the point of view of ethos, from the point of view of normative or moral basic doctrine, you can't actually deal with them at all; they are just, somehow heretics or whatever, and I just find it …, to play the whole thing over onto a, a merely scientific terrain, I also find it politically sensible again. Every assertion of criteria, every assertion of starting points, premises, etc., or of theory structures always creates people who don't agree.
p.18 My theory is something like an Experiment. So I feel more related to the experimental sciences than, for example, to the ethical sciences. But also for experiments there must be, so to speak, common starting conditions, and in natural science this is simple, there is a measurable nature, and a mathematics, of which we don't know exactly why it is the way it is, but it is the way it is. And with the help of measurements and mathematics one creates a basis, about whose ethics and about whose sensefulness it is difficult to discuss. But how is it in society?