Tik Tok's algorithms have likely superceeded the pioneering analysis that aimed to bring empirical data to bear on the hypothesis that technoenvironmental variables determine basic social and cultural patterns in human society.
If Gouldner and Peterson's Technology and the Moral Order is still relevant today, it's because the tendency to assert a single factor--economic, biological or technical (determinism); maybe: "the" system-- to explain "where we're headed" still breeds polemic. So does the cloud of particulars that surround supply and demand, transaction costs and the unintended consequences of the platform economy on social and urban life.
But -- if-- as the writers of "Technology and the Moral Order" conclude, technology influences culture by a hair, then the question is not which technologies prove the staying power of societies but how. And, if ideas don't change the world, but tools, then how do ideas work (if at all?)
https://archive.org/details/notesontechnolog0000goul/page/n17/mode/2up